...You see things; and you say, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were; and I say, 'Why not?'

I'll tell you "Why Not" - it's crazy.  But fun to think about.

I bike a lot when I am not doing something on Wander.  So, while biking, was thinking about how to marry the two and get some benefit. Given that I hate the beast under the board (my diesel), and want to figure out another way of getting propulsion (yuhong? outboard?), anyway...

Am also a fan of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, which gives all you need to know about the genesis of the idea.

Have a mountable seat with a fixed gear and an extended bike chain attached to a large canvas windmill which would produce sufficient air current to move the boat a knot or two in dead air!  I know I can engineer the seat/pedal/gear configuration to be removable and stowable, and the mill/gear/post to also be removable/collapsable/stowable.  Now if I can just get a stereo installed to play the Wizard of Oz music which accompanies the mean lady up the road on her bike (she turns into the wicked witch in Dorothy's dream).

If you're not laughing now, you're not drinking enough...

HA!!  The shot of the dog peering out is pure comedy.  If only we would look so good peering out of our proposed bubbles.  I might only guarantee that there'd be slightly less drool on the inside of my dome.

On viewing, I assume that if I am inside needing the dome to peer out, then the wind is fiarly strong and the boat is well heeled over, so viewing the weather side is going to be spotty at best.  My main thought was less viewing the weather side and forward, as viewing the lee and aft - lee for whatever we might be coming down on, and aft to manage the approach of waves, esp. when running before the wind.

Think our JJT stemheads are all the same?  Think Stainless Outfitters would be interested in a group deal for a discount?  We could put together a bulk order (those of us who want to replace/upgrade to SS with bow roller) and deliver one stemhead for duplication.  I'd be game if they would be able to produce some savings given a larger order....

30

(29 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

not sure if it is helpful or indicative, but playing around last weekend in F5-6 breeze (strong breeze), had only the jib up furled in a whole lot, not filling the foretriangle, and she sailed herself "on a rail" without a hand on the tiller/windvane anywhere from 70 degrees off the wind through 115.  I thought this was interesting...

I'm looking at replacement of the stemhead as well as, along with a general upgrade to rigging.  A fabricated SS316 1/4inch stemphead with integrated bow roller priced out at $450, but labor ran to about $1,800 (!).  That stopped me in my tracks, even though I think it is a necessary change which will give me more peace of mind when I'm out (like last Saturday in Force 6 on the Chesapeake Bay with gusts to near gale...that was COOL!).

I did go with what may be the most reputable and trustworthy rigger on the Bay (and therefore pricey), but perhaps you get what you pay for?  Any advice on the pricing?

32

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

thanks....we're all fairly fortunate to be CO26 caretakers!

from the tips and experience, next time the beast under the cockpit floor demands a cash feeding, it will be seeing the door.  Seems like a bracket and a smaller outboard, under 10hp will serve the purpose just fine.  Time to start taking the measurements and doing the planning - that part usually takes me 6 months alone on average for my projects.

33

(10 replies, posted in Technical)

not thinking about the thru-hull...thinking about the pumpout on the deck (one of the two capped holes on starboard mid-ship - one for filling the water tank, the other for pumping out the head) capped off like the fuel tank fill.

34

(10 replies, posted in Technical)

I am in the middle of a similar effort.  Am building a platform on which the Thetford will be secured, which in turn is secured between the bulkheads and on cross members secured in the same bolt positions of the old head, plus one, which on mine cross the 24" span of the entire locker at 6" increments.  The platform will lift out in order to access the space below, nicely separated into 6" by 12" storage areas (about 3" deep), as well as additional depth in the front 4" which will become a bin of sorts - I saved the old backing for the locker to rebuild a front which matches the opposite wet locker in height, and expect to insert a similar horizontal piece as is found on the front of the wet locker as a brace.  I expect to use this space for three canvas tool rolls (with tools of course).  The bin will hold all the random small clamps, etc. securely without too much fuss.

To your question - feet may be easily rested on the horizontal piece.  All closes up nicely in the original space with original doors.  As an aside I will build a drop down top behind the head for additional nav space with cubbies behind for nav tools, which gets me to the hardest part of the job, installing an additional LED light in there.

Mind you, I've only removed the head and taken measurements thus far preparing to build in the off season...

FYI on holding tank.  Been going back and forth on how to best use that space.  I've been a bit concerned about putting anything potable in there, and settled on using same space for a locker for the heaviest stuff, especially anchor chain, in order to keep that weight as low and as centered as possible.  Am also going to secure a larger volume fixed pump on the underside of the hatch in the sole there for emergencies...flip the hatch over, slip end of hose already led into the deepest part of the bilge just aft, throw the exit hose into the cockpit, and go at it.  Noodling whether there might be a way to convert the existing head pumpout (which of course now is unnecessary) into the exit for this emergency pump so that in such emergency it would be possible to pump out with the cabin secured (ie. no boards removed to cockpit).  The issue is how to lead the hose without having to follow the same path as the existing head hose, which I feel may be too long for a pump, assuming the pump is even able to lift the water up the 5' to the level of the head pump out.

35

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

36

(3 replies, posted in Sails & Rigging)

Moitessier diligently lubriacted his running rigging, sometimes daily when expecting rough weather - both the sheets and halyards especially where they ran through blocks.

Does anyone out there do this or something akin to it?

37

(9 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

amen brother....the boat likely still has stores and fresh water.  Might even be able to salvage some of the electrical workings or the outboard.  Even submerged you may have a chance at slightly affecting your direction versus being at the mercy of the currents and winds.  A shark wont be able to nip a hole in you out of "curiousity".  But above all, it gives you a chance to make emergency repairs when you normally would not be able to.  I am still amazed at some of the legends of the sea who were able to throw mat over a hole to slow the flow, get it properly tied off topsides without it getting sucked through, all before it was too late.

An EPIRB is nice and I carry one, as well as a raft, but if it is dead, gets separated from me, if you are "way out there" where either the closest are not willing or able to respond, well, you are on your own.  Would rather be as self-dependent as possible in the first place so that there is little chance would need to place someone elses life in jeopardy unnecessarily anyway.

Finally, love my boat.  Losing her would be a heartbreak I think I'll try just a bit to avoid...

38

(9 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

fyi...my thinking has progressed, thankds to the want to go engineless.  Removing the engine of course reduces float requirements, but lets assume I chew that weight savings up with rum.  Once the iron horse is removed and the thru-hulls all repaired, am thinking that glassing in the after part of the area below the cockpit sole with an access panel in the after part of the sole will provide about 40ish cubic feet of floatation.  Leave the engine mounts in place and attaching a 2k lb capacity (approx 32 cubic feet for the Turtlepac 1000) float bag so that it lifts the hull not the deck (thereby not risking spearation of deck/hull at joint), and same scheme attaching to the holding tank (which I've converted into a chain locker), gets me to over 100 - enough to float the 7k lbs.  In an emergency, jettisoning extra chain, anchors, etc. brings weight down to 6,500, and with the misc trapped air around and some installed foam, it might all add up to enough extra allowance to make up the difference should one of the three elements fail (popped bag, holed in stern, etc.)

Finally, taking into account all positive floatation I'll get from the rum, since alcohol is lighter than water, I'll need a basket to attach to the bottom once she takes off like a hot air balloon...

wow...that is one sweet CO26...I am in awe

40

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

will do this weekend...thanks!  Thinking about it last night, it seems like such a solid solution

41

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

outboard - good thought.  I've got a big windvane with all the plumbing hanging off the back though over the rudder, big honking monitor style - would prevent an outboard being mounted anywhere in the rear....

42

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

I hate that demon under the cockpit floor.  It is evil and is set to bankrupt me financially and  If it has its way, it will ruin the rest of my days...

So, next time it breaks down and repairs require a mechanic or someone besides me with a price tag over $500, I am thinking "out, out damned spot!"  An exorcism of the beast to give the soul of my Contessa a new life a renew the spirit.

What thinks ye?  What worries would haunt your nightmares, such as facing a 40 knot wind pressed against a lee shore, needing to claw off with only your canvas and perseverence to save you and your ship?

Others have done it...am I crazy like them?

43

(5 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

wouldn't a 120 degree swing mean 60 degree angle of attack sailing to windward at best?  Might be my imagination, but I am nearly certain I've been better than that, closer to 45 degrees (or a 90 degree turn through the wind on a tack).  Perhaps my perception is bent by true vs apparent wind, but I even tried to account for that...

44

(5 replies, posted in Sails & Rigging)

not sure if it is helpful, but in The Long Way by Moitessier, he described his preferred emergency method of dealing with such situations.  He had a large diameter thimble (large diameter as to not cause too much stress on the shroud) around which he turned the short shroud, back up on itself, clamped together again with three cable clamps, closest to the thimble looser then progressively tighter up the shroud.  Through the thimble he had a shackle joined to a length of chain and again joined to the turnbuckle or another shackle, with the hole tensioned as appropriate by the turnbuckle as usual.

One of the easiest most understandable and direct jury rig systems I've seen (and which I now carry proper parts for, as they are regular parts of the inventory...).  Evidently, as he was sailing around the world 1.5x, he left this jury rig on for more than one full circumnavigation...

45

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

...and with the improvements the relaunch would be a tremendous success!  There are in my opinion no reasonably priced boats out there right now which are serving the segment of the market the Contessas are able to serve...small sized, sea worthy, blue water capable boats for sailors interested in quality, reliability and value - would love to hear if any have in-production boats they think compete with our babies.  The smaller Island Packets are the only ones I can think of which come close...

46

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

I own a post 83 JJT as well and would start with that design.  Besides adding pretty much all the improvements made by seeadler, I'd change the hatch config for engine access (the panel and screws are a pain in the ass and if you actually had an emergency with thru hulls or hoses under there, you'd be resting nicely on the bottom by the time you reached it).  I'd build in longitudinal stringers and improve the battery compartment in the sole, maybe to even hold three (starter and 2 house!).  Would be nice to have a second water tank/air tight storage on the bow duplicating the same on the one side and perhaps a bit more hardware topside...

47

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

48

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

The two formulas give oar lengths of just short of 14 feet for the former and just over 15 feet for the latter.  Has anyone had practical experience managing a Contessa with oars, and where do you tie those down when not in use?

49

(11 replies, posted in Site Support/Comments)

don't they have better things to do with their time, like mess around on sailboats or dreaming about messing around on sailboats?

50

(11 replies, posted in Site Support/Comments)

Adrian....joining the chorus in praise of you and what you do for us...THANKS!!!!