Also ,it's good to epoxy glass the donut after shaping as this will prevent it drying out and getting homely ower time.

The tot is a sweet little stove,very nice addition.Mine is Starboard with drawers beside it,where the ice box used to be.

I have (in my boat) three inch stainless deck iron with over sized hole and plywood donut outside.Comes with rubber gasket .Try Dickinson stoves,Vancouver Canada.Yiou also need elbows to allow for expansion of pipe length wise and about three feet of over head clearance.Stoves a great thing to have.

29

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

Thanks for the Info.Very interesting stuff.

30

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

Thanks for that;some more blanks filled in.The author is mighty fond of the Contessa.Do you know if the wood Contessa was built from Sadlers lines and was the mold taken off the wood or the glass boat......You might have an opinion on this:I want to add a shoe to support the bottom of the rudder on my boat.I see two possibilities,a metal addition,or glassing a nub on,maybe with a graphite bearing(graphite powder and epoxy).The glass option seems easier and makes no additional holes in the boat.Your feed back on this would be appreciated.

31

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

I follow now why there are no exact lines,but you could add the skin thickness to the British offsets if they existed.I understand the British boats are I.F.s,so I take it to mean that they are sturdier but with the same lines as the nordic boat,or is it drawn differently.Was the cold molded hull lifted off the british boat,or built from molds as a British boat?I am really curious now,the difference between the half dozen or so derivatives of the Nordic boat.Some of the boats And the Contessa is one might be called folkboat styles as oppossed to types?

32

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

The lines aren't much,but for a model at a small scale,how much accuracy is really needed.Was the Rodgers woodie a Nordic folkboat or a derivative such as the Stella.There is a signifigant difference in beam,freeboard and displacement between the twoWhich suggests to me that the Contessa must be a little firmer bilged to carry that extra weight.I see the resembalance,but when I am tied up next to an I.F or folkboat they look much dantier.Just curious.

33

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

Thats a lovely boat GWW,but I misunderstood,and thoughta model of the old Contessa was wanted,and it had crossed my mind to do a half model.The lines could work fine (old Contessa)if I could print them off at a usable scale  to make a table of offsets.

34

(1 replies, posted in General Questions/Comments)

For the book list,have to recomendthe"Storm Tactics Handbook",by Lin and Larry Pardey.Excellent,hands on advice,and strategy,for getting through the worst weather in one peice.They also condense and analyse information from books such as heavy weather sailing,and draw conclusions.

35

(16 replies, posted in Technical)

Just had a quicklook for some lines or offsets for the Contessa.If I could find these ,I could make a half model in red cedar and send it on.

In the former engine space.

37

(29 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

I have a roller .I lose ten degrees going to weather reefed.I had my staysail altered to fit the furler as this sail is useful thru a wide wind range,and surprisingly close to the genoa in windard performance.Because it is such a chore to change I decide at anchor what sail to bend on.Reaching and running I fly my single luff spinaker all the time now,much better than the genoa,so there is afairly small range of conditions where I actually lose much performance.A storm jib is next ,as the rolled jib still sucks.

38

(5 replies, posted in Cruising)

My averages this summer,to the Charolottes in heavy wind,3.9 and return,3.2 in mostly light wind plus some on the nose.The boat really slows down in the troughs.Flying the chute I would have returned quicker in the light wind,with more consistent average speed.There is much tidal current but I could not fidgure out the set.

39

(15 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

To state the obvicous,an engine is a great convience.Not much help in a blow,but being becalmed for three days really does blow,even when you have ample time on your hands.Making tidal passes at the right time is very challenging,at leat here with the traffic and speeds up to about 15 knots in places.Thus far I have found the objective hazards to be calms in bad places ,and being carried down on to a reef in light or no wind conditions.In places the bottom can come up very fast.I also try to stay the hell out of the way of tugs and barges,though these are likely the most professional sailors on the coast;they are not manuverable.I listen to the traffic channel 24 hours aday on the coast,so I know who to look out for in advance.That said,try it out.You will never be more engaged with sailing than when you are without a motor.My vote for basic propulsion is a two horse Honda hung on the rudder,or wherever,it will certainlly encorage one to sail.

40

(5 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

I am 80 on flat water,90 more normal,and as much as 120 when it is very rough.No clue as to why your tack angle is so wide.

41

(5 replies, posted in Cruising)

The bad news.No anchoring in Victoria,incredible but true.Esquimalt,not convient.The best is Tseum Harbour(Sidney),Oak Bay,but you need real good ground tackle or a mooring and near the yacht club in Cadboro bay,a little out of the way.I only know one person right now that stays on the hook year round,but maybe you will be the second.You probably already know ,the tides can be pretty swift around here,so if you are engineless your always postioning your self not to get carried down on reefs and such.Stay out of Active Pass,without an engine,around the bottom of Saurna or through Porlier pass much much better.Bill

42

(5 replies, posted in Cruising)

Even tho Vancouver is very close,I haven't been there for years so I don't know much about what is going on there.Sidney is boat central here with many marinas,three yards,and some nice sailing,with many islands and coves.I live in Victoria,close to downtown in a great little marina;were definetly boat nuts here.I would guess that job prospects are very good out here right now,and the cruising is great.And yeah I live on my Contessa as well and it suits me well.Let me know if you need more specific information about Victoria.Might be ableto introduce you to someone in a yard.Caio Bill

43

(5 replies, posted in Cruising)

Engineless bro,maybe you will stop in Victoria.Cheers Bill

44

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

Oar storage.After trying a number of different places I settled onplacing the loom inside the forward stanchion and the tip of the blade inside the after stanchion with the middle lightly jammed against the middle port hole.It sticks out about two feet forward and even with water pouring in over the coamings in a broach does not budge.It is annoyingly under foot,but can be deployed in ten seconds.It was necessary to have the anchor rode flaked down on deck for rapid deployment(I feel)when near land .By putting the chain inside the coil of line it never shifted even in some very snotty weather.The wet rode has a lot of tractionwith the weight of chainon it.A good sail inventory in paticular light air sails,as mentioned by Donald duck,are a must have.Half the way back from the charolottes I was flying a single luff spinaker even while asleep,and is now my best friend.What a good sail..................This is a fabulous little boat for this kind of sailing.

45

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

I just glanced at yhe oar site.Very interesting.I think it is dreaming to think that one could row or scoll a contessa into 15 knots of wind,hard work in a pulling boat.About five knots has been the practial limit for me and it is slow.Due to pitching and rolling it is some time after a blow before the boat can be moved by oar.600 ft of anchor line and some sea room will probably keep you off the beach.A big radar reflector is also good cause you sure want to be seen if you have no steerage way,which happens in the course of a daySome further thoughts on oars:Seeing forward is a problem sitting,and a fairly high angle of entry standing,meaning they are shorter but must be lifted higher to clear the water.....It is very satisfing sailing the boat sans motor but calls on many more skills that are not always honed when we can just bail with the motor,i.e.,you just have to take it onthe chin if you can not motor in ahead of a storm,and this happens........In short manually moving the boat is fun and impresses the hell out dockside longers(or they think you are a loon)but I would not have really high expectations.Oh yeah and the tide can sweep you miles past where you want to go when the wind falls as happened this week on the way back to Vancouver Is resulting in an up all night sailthru pea soup fog in the main traffic lane,no fun.That has happened three times this summer,as some places you just don't want to anchor.....And having used a youloh and sculling oar over the years I would give the nod to the youloh.......The speed limitation is that the oar starts to float up as you gain speed.I find at about two knots I can,t scull fast enough to keep the oar immersed,but maybe it needs some tuning....Last winter there was an article in the wooden boat about making a Japanese youloh.....Again my averave cruisin speed I estimate at 1.2 and 1.6 ktallowing for tide and such.

46

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

My oar Is 14 feet.It,s been wonderfull but different,but an engine is in the works.The main problem with oars is that the boat is to high and narrow.The weight you would have to lift due to the outboard length would make it a lot of work.A sculling oar is pure torque and the preferred method for an individual ina heavy boat. Happy sails,Bill

47

(15 replies, posted in Boat handling / Performance)

I am in the Charolottes now ,engineless.I have a twelve foot sculling oar(over the stern)that moves the boat at an easy 1.2 knots.Most places I can sail in and out.I took the genoa off weeks ago and put the jib on and left it.T he speed difference was;nt great and the boat is so much handier.The oarlock isjust a bit of teak noched and angled to suit the oar.I would forget about oar(s) on a boat this size;to much work.

The engine is out now and I am mounting an outboard for the summer.This is what I have learned.The water jacket on the barrel is shot for the usual reasons.There does not appear to be a water jacket zinc so salt water sailors might want to purge the cooling system on the farryman if laid up by T ing off the intake.I did have water back up thru the exhaust system after a prolonged hand cranking session trying to recharge the fuel system.Something is a bit different about this diesiel than others I have had,r.e. getting fuel back up to the injector.Hand cranking does not create enough pressure to carry the water out of the wet muffler so that it backed up and filled the engine via the exhaust port,as evidenced by the gurgling sound and a rise in the oil level.The Vetus wet muffler has a drain in the bottom but is unreachable in this boat,so whatever goes back in,I will put a remote outlet on it .I now think this is a neccessity.Also the lift pump on this engine dosen't seem to work.As long as the alternator can be kept in good repair I will probably stick with this engine,but have to research that.I have added water tanks in the engine space to try and restore the trim which was just so before the weekend.O.K.,hopefully I will be gone tomorrow.

I think it was actually about 135.00 plus tax ,pretty for a pin and post I thought,however they are well made in the U.K..We used the backing plate that came with the post and with the assistance of my limber !6 year old plus plus sweating ,swearing and the sacrifice of a smmall amount of skin ,the deed was done.The under hung mount will graze the cowl vents if you have them on the back deck.

50

(2 replies, posted in Repairs/Modifications/Upgrades)

Found